data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b127a/b127afc960f3b55b69eb647a258f6b44f26ebaba" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/788ae/788ae977c275972bc3299c45dbb30210d868e9e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1640/a1640c063096490a0981b56b0c1115626c5f7e50" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa842/aa8429f8b45ffffcffd395f2835f29c022715992" alt=""
The beauty of lineage is that it tells you more than you should know. The figures entangled in their own lines, buried in a mass of accidents, undefined by the very form that describes them, tell us the story. The narrative, the line, the hermeneutic* identity of what would-have-been, all this appears to us if we go beyond the simple drawing of havoc. But can we actually defend this as a principle? Maybe not, but in pragmatic terms, if even the site invites us to a general, overall lecture, to a combining of various phases of Research, then I say, hey, go for it, beyond the Pandorra's box of a depressing painting, into the line that completes it, giving it an entire universe to refer to.
*I can't believe I'm actually using this creepy word...
No comments:
Post a Comment